SAM IS ....
ARPAS-UK welcomes the CAA’s recommendations as per CAP3105, but with two key areas of concern. Significant growth in the Open Category expected if implemented.

15 May 2025 – The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) published on 8 May 2025 CAP3105, setting out its recommendations to the Department for Transport (DfT) following the 2023 consultation on the UK UAS Regulation Review (CAP2610). 

These recommendations are significant as they clarify the regulatory framework for the Open Category once the transition period ends on 1 January 2026. This comes at a time when the UK Government is aiming to simplify regulations to support growth—where safely possible—and as the industry benefits from two to three years of operational experience across Europe. 

CAP3105 summary & Implications for the UK Drone Industry

ARPAS-UK welcomes the intent to simplify and expand operations in the Open Category. Overall, the recommendations are proportionate and aligned with fostering sustainable growth. 

The proposed expansion of the Open Category represents a significant opportunity for industry growth. At present, the A1 and A2 subcategories offer limited practical value due to their restrictive operational criteria. By introducing class marking, which provides a level of assurance regarding a UAS’s robustness and safety, these constraints can be meaningfully eased.

However, we highlight two areas of concern that we believe warrant further discussion with industry stakeholders:

  • The adequacy of remote pilot training, particularly in A1 and A2 subcategories
  • Unaddressed issues related to Remote ID raised during the 2023 consultation

If implemented as outlined in CAP3105, we anticipate that many current PDRA01 holders operating in the Specific Category may find the revised A1 and A2 framework a simpler and more efficient regulatory pathway for routine operations. This shift would reduce administrative burdens, increase operational flexibility, and enable more agile commercial drone services within the Open Category.

UK Class Marking would begin as soon as January 2026, initially using EU Class Marking, then transitioning to UK Class Marking only from Jan 2028

The CAA recommends the formal introduction of UK-specific class markings: UK0, UK1, UK2, etc. These will serve as the national standard for identifying UAS that meet defined design and performance requirements. The CAA would play its new role as the UK Market Surveillance Authority, and validate UK Class marking.

  • Transition Period: From 1 January 2026 to 1 January 2028, drones marked with EITHER EU class labels (C0, C1, C2, etc.) OR UK-marked drones would be seamlessly accepted within the UK Open Category. 
  • From 1 January 2028, only UK-class marked drones will be permitted in the Open Category.

The CAA may diverge from EASA Class Marking over time, but in absence of major divergence, EU class marked drones should be reviewed swiftly by the CAA and receive UKx class marking.

Clarification of Open Category Subcategories labels to ‘Over people’ (A1), ‘Near people’ (A2), and ‘Far from people’ (A3)

To enhance clarity for UAS operators—particularly newcomers—CAP3105 introduces more intuitive labels for Open Category subcategories:

  • A1: “Over People” — Will allow overflight using EU1/UK1 drones weighing <900g. This is a notable expansion from the current 500g threshold and will include a broader range of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) drones.
  • A2: “Near People” — Will allow operation within 30m of uninvolved people, reduced to 5m with low-speed mode activated, using EU2/UK2 drones <4kg. The current 2kg limit and lack of proximity flexibility have made A2 operations impractical in many urban environments. The new criteria mark a substantial improvement.
  • A3: “Far from People” — Minimum distance from individual buildings is reduced from 150m to 50m, facilitating operations in less densely populated areas.

>>> Area of Concern 1: Training adequacy

During the 2023 consultation, concerns around remote pilot training were not widely prioritised. We welcome the ability to fly over uninvolved people in A1 with a <900g drone, but is the FlyerID online training still adequate? Similarly, is the current A2 CoC training – which can be completed with a one-day online course – still adequate training when flying 5m away from uninvolved people with a 4kg drone? The A2CoC certificate is valid for 5 years. Does a five-year validation period still reflect best practice, given the pace of technological and regulatory change? 

While we acknowledge there have been few/no? reported incidents in Europe, this major change is an opportunity to further improve education and enhance professionalism in the open category.

>>> Area of Concern 2: Remote ID — Unresolved Issues

Remote ID is the ability of a UAS to communicate identification and location information during flight. Remote ID will make it possible to differentiate between legitimate UAS operators and those misusing UAS, enabling more effective enforcement and deterrence.

CAP3105 recommends implementing Remote Identification (Remote ID) for drones in the Open Category. The preferred model is Hybrid RID, combining direct broadcast and network-based identification via mobile networks. However, since Network RID is not yet available and/or costly, the interim solution is Direct Remote ID.

ARPAS-UK agrees that Remote ID is essential for law enforcement and public trust. Yet, we remain concerned that CAP3105 does not address issues we raised during the 2023 consultation, including:

  • Funding: Will the Home Office support the infrastructure rollout?
  • Data Access: Who will have access to RID information? We stress that this should be limited to authorised enforcement agencies, and compliant with GDPR.
  • Just Culture: It must be clear how RID data will be used, ensuring it does not undermine the principles of fairness and trust within the aviation community.

Direct RID is known to be easily circumvented, raising questions about its effectiveness. Still, we agree that the industry must take initial steps toward responsible and enforceable UAS operations, especially as one incident can compromise the community’s livelihood. 

We will seek return of experience from the USA and Europe on the matter, and seek further dialogue with key stakeholders on this issue, to understand the response to our concerns.

Introduction of Geoawareness

CAP3105 recommends the introduction of geoawareness as part of Class Marking

  • From 1st January 2026, geo-awareness will be implemented only for UK1, UK2 and UK3 UAS
  • From 1st January 2028, geo-awareness will also be required for UK0 UAS with cameras weighing 100g or more.
  • The geo-awareness requirements for UK5 and UK6 UAS will continue to be optional. 
  • UK4 UAS, legacy UAS and privately built UAS will remain out of scope.

As this functionality is already present in most COTS drones with EU class marking, ARPAS-UK had expressed its support in 2023 for its introduction.

Visual Distinction in Night Operations

Strobes used for night flying should be reconsidered to ensure they are visually distinct from those used on crewed aircraft. Recent incidents in New Jersey and New York highlight the risk of confusion, where drones were mistaken for crewed aircraft. Using different colours or patterns could help prevent such misidentification and improve situational awareness for all airspace users.

CAP3105 legislative process – What happens next?

The Department for Transport (DfT) will now consider whether to adopt the CAA’s proposed changes. Should the DfT decide to proceed, the necessary amendments to existing regulations will be enacted via a statutory instrument.

It is important to note that the timeline for this legislative process remains uncertain, as it will depend on the DfT’s internal priorities and the broader government legislative agenda. 

About ARPAS-UK

ARPAS-UK is a Non-Profit Trade Association founded in 2013, empowering the UK drone Industry. Our objective is to accelerate the safe and professional adoption of drones across all industries, unlocking transformative for the economy and wider society. 

We engage with a broad range of stakeholders with a fair and balanced approach, we foster a collaborative approach across the ecosystem. We advocate respect, inclusiveness and politeness in exchanges, and request professionalism within its membership through compliance with an agreed Code of Conduct. 

More Regulation related webposts:

15 May 2025

SAM IS ....
DRONE CLASS MARKING ON ITS WAY TO THE UK. CAA Review of UK UAS Regulations Consultation Reply Document.

The UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has published CAP3105, “Review of UK Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Regulations: Consultation Reply Document.” This document outlines the CAA’s final policy recommendations following a comprehensive review of the UK’s UAS regulations, initiated in 2023 and sponsored by the Department for Transport (DfT).

Key Objectives

The review aimed to:

  • Simplify the existing regulatory framework for UAS operations.
  • Enhance education and awareness among UAS users.
  • Improve safety and security measures.
  • Support the UAS sector’s transition to updated regulations.

Consultation Process

The CAA engaged with stakeholders through the CAP2610 consultation, published on 22 November 2023. Feedback was reviewed in collaboration with the DfT, Home Office, and Police to inform the final policy recommendations.

Policy Recommendations

The CAA’s recommendations focus on:

  • Implementing UK-specific class marking to facilitate innovative UAS use cases.
  • Ensuring a smooth transition for operators to the new regulatory framework.
  • Reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens while maintaining safety and security standards.
  • Allowing continued use of existing UAS devices where feasible.

Next Steps

The CAA will submit its formal opinion to the DfT, which will decide on implementing the proposed changes. If adopted, the changes will be enacted through a statutory instrument, with the timeline determined by the DfT. The CAA will collaborate with relevant authorities to ensure effective implementation across the public sector.

More Regulation related webposts:

8 May 2025

SAM IS ....
CAP 722B, ed 5, UK SORA & Remote Pilot Competency AMC/GM announced by CAA

The CAA has published the ORS9 decision, ORS9 CAA Decision No.46, setting out the UK Specific Operation Risk Assessment (SORA) as Acceptable Means of Compliance to UK Regulation (EU) 2019/947 Article 11. This will become effective on 23 April 2025, and be updated in the Regulatory Library shortly.

The CAA has also published new Remote Pilot Competence standards as AMC, and an update to CAP722B.

Find out more on their website about SORA.


UK SORA: The CAA has developed the UK Specific Operation Risk Assessment (UK SORA) methodology to enable UAS operators to comply with the requirements for conducting an operational risk assessment set out in the UAS Regulation (UK Regulation (EU) 2019/947). New expanded AMC on remote pilot competence has been developed to support remote pilot training and progression for increasingly complex UAS operations.

Remote Pilot Competence – CAP 722B: This revision has been issued to introduce Entity requirements for applications in relation to the new remote pilot competence scheme introduced as Acceptable Means of Compliance to Article 8 of the UK Regulation (EU) 2019/947. In addition, new requirements, and guidance material regarding the use of Flight Simulator Training Devices (FSTD) has been provided. To improve clarity, this document has been restructured to include specific requirements, means of compliance (if applicable), and guidance material sections.

Watch the ARPAS-UK Fireside Chat on UK SORA

3 March 2025

SAM IS ....
CAA’s Letter to PDRA01 & OSC Holders on SORA Transition

See below the letter sent on 7 February 2025 to all PDRA01 holders on SORA Transition. OSC holders received a very similar letter. In short:

PDRA-01 OAs are not affected by the introduction of UK SORA. No expected changes before 31 March 2026.

Introduction of UK Specific Operation Risk Assessment (UK SORA)

  • UK SORA will replace the OSC methodology (CAP 722A) in Q2 2025.
  • Aims to provide more transparent, structured, and consistent risk assessments for UAS operators.
  • Based on JARUS SORA v2.5.
  • A new digital UK SORA Application Service will streamline applications.

Differences Between UK SORA and OSC-Based Applications

  • UK SORA is quantitative, reducing subjectivity in risk assessments.
  • The application is online and guides users through SORA steps.
  • The process is split into two phases, so all assurance evidence is not required at the start.
  • An online calculator will help applicants determine necessary mitigation measures.

Impact on Current Operational Authorisations (OAs)

  • Existing OSC-based OAs remain valid until expiry.
  • Renewal using OSC is possible only before the UK SORA Application Service goes live.
  • New applications after UK SORA implementation must use the UK SORA process.
  • Two webinars will be set up directly by the CAA to guide operators.

Key Dates

  • Q1 2025 – UK SORA policy published (not yet in force).
  • Q1 2025 – Remote Pilot Competency Policy published.
  • Q2 2025 – RAE(F) and SAIL Mark policy concepts published.
  • Q2 2025 – UK SORA goes live and becomes mandatory.

Read more Regulation related news on our Regulatory Matters – News Repository

CAA Website | Drones

10 February 2025

SAM IS ....
Live Fireside Chat 01 | UK PDRA-01 Standstill – WATCH AGAIN

CEO Anne-Lise Scaillierez and ARPAS-UK Director David Thurston hosted the first live-streamed Fireside Chat, discussing the CAA’s announcement to delay significant changes to the UK PDRA-01.

Live Chat was available during the stream to Subscribers of our YouTube Channel

If you would like to read ARPAS-UK’s official Statement on the CAA’s announcement regarding PDRA-01, please find it here.

3 February 2025

SAM IS ....
ARPAS-UK Statement on UK PDRA-01: welcome standstill, as advocated

ARPAS UK welcomes the Civil Aviation Authority’s (CAA) announcement regarding the postponement of significant changes to UK PDRA-01. The decision to maintain the current iteration of PDRA-01 until 31 March 2026 demonstrates an understanding of the industry’s need for stability during the introduction of UK SORA (Specific Operations Risk Assessment).

DiSCO, the digital platform for PDRA01 applications, was a success, and the community recognises it. There is no value in another cycle of changing regulations and format with no benefit in terms of operating envelope, and following a new methodology that has not been tested yet with the OSC/ORA holders. 

In December 2024, ARPAS UK highlighted concerns to the CAA regarding the transition to the SORA methodology and advocated for “no impact, no change” on existing PDRA-01 operations. We are pleased to see the CAA addressing these concerns and delaying immediate changes, allowing operators to continue their activities without disruption.

Learning from Europe’s Experience: very low adoption of very conservative PDRAs. Must put more thoughts into proportionate, useful PDRAs.  

Feedback from the EASA IAM Forum in October 2024 highlights the low adoption rates of SORA-based PDRAs and Standard Scenarios in Europe. The EASA PDRAs derived from SORA are notably conservative and impose restrictions far greater than those under UK PDRA-01. They do not adequately meet industry needs and as a result adoption so far is low. The SORA methodology is developed, but its implementation is still a work in progress. It has become clear now that those initial scenarios need rework to become effective tools.  A review of UK PDRA01 that would result in an alignment with one of those PDRAs would hinder “business as usual” operations for many UK operators.

Advocating proportionality in the UK approach to SORA 

While aligning UK operations with the global standards followed by JARUS member countries offers long-term benefits, ARPAS-UK remains concerned about the challenges posed by the transition to SORA: 

  • The SORA methodology should enable us to do more complex operations, more consistently, and following an approach that can be exported.
  • For lower risk operations however, a full SORA application is most likely disproportionate and … beyond many operators’ grasp. ARPAS-UK suggests adopting simpler, more relevant authorisation frameworks, such as additional PDRAs or generic SORAs, where the CAA has done the work of mastering the SORA methodology and provides proportionate standard recipes that operators can easily understand and implement.

The current PDRA-01 covers drones up to 25kg, yet many operators fly much smaller, lower-risk drones. ARPAS UK continues to advocate for additional PDRAs tailored to the realities of drone operations, focusing on:

  • Reduced distances from uninvolved people for low-mass, low-speed, low-height drone operations.
  • BVLOS (Beyond Visual Line of Sight) with visual observers, also known as extended VLOS.
  • Higher operational heights, exceeding the current maximum of 120m.

We propose standardised and scalable authorisations, not location-specific, and facilitated through a streamlined, digitised process. These improvements would make low-risk activities more accessible, encouraging more operators to apply for or renew their Operational Authorisations.

As the UK’s trade association for the drone industry, ARPAS UK strongly supports regulation that is both appropriate and proportionate. We believe that relevant and accessible authorisations will encourage operators to remain within the regulatory framework, promoting industry growth and maintaining high safety standards.

By continuing to engage with the CAA and advocating for sensible regulatory solutions, ARPAS-UK aims to ensure that the UK drone industry thrives under a system that balances safety with operational practicality.

SAM IS ....
ARPAS-UK advocates for transparency surrounding  the 2018 Gatwick [No?] Drone Incident Narrative AND urges the community to fly responsibly within the law, especially around airports.

First: ARPAS-UK, the UK’s leading drone industry body, calls for a revision of the narrative surrounding the 2018 Gatwick Airport incident. No credible evidence of malicious drone activity at Gatwick Airport was provided post-investigations. Yet, to this day, the Gatwick Drone incident and its sensational coverage has had far-reaching negative implications for the drone industry.

Second: ARPAS-UK advocates for the responsible use of drones, both recreationally and commercially, and recommends addressing the evidence-based issue of airspace infringements near airports through education and awareness. 

The 2018 Gatwick event

Despite the widespread reports at the time, subsequent investigations and freedom of information requests have failed to produce any credible evidence supporting claims of sustained malicious drone activity. As we enter 2025, continuing to assert that Gatwick Airport suffered a three-day disruption in December 2018 due to such activity lacks credible backing.

The ramifications of this incident have been far-reaching and detrimental to the drone industry. The sensational coverage has contributed to a negative perception of drones, leading to stricter regulations both in the UK and internationally.  This event has also tarnished the industry’s reputation, with the public associating drones with disruption and danger. Such misperceptions overshadow the potential of drones to drive economic, environmental, and social benefits. Some media however seem unable to help themselves and cannot resist talking about 2018.

Addressing the evidence-based issue of airspace infringements near airports through education and awareness. 

We support reasonable and proportionate measures to prevent misuse near sensitive areas such as airports, prisons, and critical infrastructure. Violating these laws, particularly actions that endanger aircraft, can lead to severe consequences, including imprisonment for up to five years. 

Since 2018, airports have significantly improved their preparedness for drone-related incidents, with many implementing detection systems and streamlined response procedures to manage drone activity effectively.

However, too many unauthorised drone flights detected in restricted zones continue to pose challenges. Many of these involve very small recreational drones which, despite their size, pose risks to other aircraft. What if an incident were to happen? 

We believe that part of the problem is that new fliers are not aware of, or do not understand the regulations and laws that are relevant to flying drones.  ARPAS-UK strongly advocates for education, communication, and simplifying the advice to reduce unauthorised flights. By equipping drone users with the knowledge of legal requirements, associated risks, and the consequences of non-compliance, we can foster a culture of safety and responsibility. ARPAS-UK contributes to National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) committees to address these concerns, promoting initiatives that support safe and lawful drone operations while encouraging innovation and growth within the industry.

The safe adoption of drones drives GDP Growth, health and safety as well societal benefits.

Drones have proven their value across various sectors. They take on tasks that are challenging, hazardous, and labour-intensive, reducing risks for workers while enhancing efficiency and productivity. From delivering life-saving medical supplies and conducting environmental monitoring to enhancing public safety and enabling infrastructure inspections, drones are transformative. With their electric propulsion systems, drones also contribute to CO2 reduction efforts.

Conclusion

The drone industry offers immense opportunities for societal and economic advancement. It is essential to base incident narratives on verified facts, and to support the safe use of drones across the recreational and commercial communities. ARPAS-UK remains committed to supporting the responsible and safe use of drones into our daily lives, delivering the benefits  of this transformative technology.

About ARPAS-UK

ARPAS-UK is a Non-Profit Trade Association founded in 2013. We serve as the Collective Voice Empowering the UK drone Industry. Our objective is to accelerate the safe and professional adoption of drones across all industries, unlocking transformative for the economy and wider society. 

ARPAS-UK strives to work in the general public interest. We engage with a broad range of stakeholders with a fair and balanced approach, we foster a collaborative approach across the ecosystem. We advocate respect, inclusiveness and politeness in exchanges, and request professionalism within its membership through compliance with an agreed Code of Conduct. 

SAM IS ....
Atypical Air Environment Policy Announcement: CAP 3040

The CAA has today, 15 October 2024, announced CAP3040: Unmanned Aircraft Operations in an Atypical Air Environment: Policy Concept. It will enable drones to fly beyond the visual line of sight (BVLOS) of remote pilots using ‘atypical air environments’.

This new policy marks a significant milestone for the future of drone operations for use in surveying national infrastructure and site security.

What is an atypical air environment? It’s an area of airspace where operators can expect there to be a reduced number of traditionally piloted aircraft, due to the proximity of ground infrastructure.

MEMBERS ONLY: you will separately have access to the Atypical Air Environment slide deck (via the NATMAC 96 post) and internal virtual debrief meeting.

ARPAS-UK welcomes and supports the introduction of the Atypical Air Environment policy, as an incremental step to facilitate BVLOS operations in lower risk environments, where no other aircraft is expected to be, for example just above assets that are inspected. These will already unlock a lot of economic value, and help the industry accumulate experience and flying hours in BVLOS.

  • New Drone Rules: The UK Civil Aviation Authority has introduced new rules allowing drones to fly beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) for infrastructure inspections.
  • Enhanced Capabilities: These rules will enable efficient inspections of power lines, wind turbines, and site security, reducing costs and improving maintenance.
  • Innovative Policy: The policy supports the integration of drones into regular airspace, ensuring safety and operational efficiency.
  • Industry Collaboration: Companies like sees.ai and National Grid are collaborating to leverage these new rules for better infrastructure management and energy transition.

15 October 2024

SAM IS ....
Tips: CAP2606 PDRA01 Ops Manual template is a proposed AMC, is it mandatory or optional?

Source: written exchange with CAA representative, July 2024

CAP2606 is a suggested format for a PDRA01 Operations Manual Template, but optional, the CAA do suggest operators use the provided template as it provides Operators with an easy-to-use method of complying with the regulations set out in CAP722H.

Q: Can operators continue to use and update their existing PDRA01 Operations Manual, reflecting as need be the CAP2606 recommendations?

Operators can continue to use and update their existing Operations Manual as long as they continue to fulfil their obligations as per UK Reg (EU) 2019/947 UAS.SPEC.050.

Note from ARPAS-UK: CAP2606 Ops Manual template is a proposed means of compliance to the operator’s obligation as per UK Reg (EU) 2019/947 UAS.SPEC.050 “Responsibilities of the UAS operator”. It is comprehensive, and in a way takes the Operator’s professionalism to an “OSC-ready” level since the underlying assumption is the maximum risk level under PDRA01. Many operators likely operate at the other end of the PDRA01 spectrum, where simpler Operations Manual and checklists could be sufficient.

Q: Will the CAA issue a guidance document to highlight the required info for those who will keep their existing Vol1?

Currently the CAA does not intend to issue further guidance for ad-hoc Operation Manual types, instead recommending that Operators move to the template suggested in CAP2606.

SAM IS ....
Test Site Requirements for Aviation Innovators: KEY FINDINGS of CAA Consultation

The United Kingdom Civil Aviation Authority is looking to facilitate the development of safe and useful RPAS and AAM test sites, where market entrants can test and evaluate their products.

This document is the summary of the key findings of the consultation exercise conducted to understand innovators’ key requirements of test facilities for their novel products.

The CAA aims to support rapid aviation innovation by understanding and addressing the needs of operators and manufacturers during testing. A survey conducted in June 2023 highlighted diverse needs and regulatory barriers faced by the industry.

The CAA has established a Test and Evaluation team, issued new policies for RPAS modifications, and begun collaborating with the Ministry of Defence.

Future Plans: The CAA plans to develop a Pre-defined Risk Assessment for RPAS testing, create a list of test sites, and support hydrogen test sites.

15 August 2024